--On 11 July 2007 06:57:20 -0700 Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm using a different failover system. I have a main server on the low > mx and several backup servers on the next highest mx. > > dummy0.junkemailfilter.com - 10 - semi-dead IP > mx.junkemailfilter.com - 20 - main server > mx.junkemailfilter.net - 30 - multiple backup servers > mx.junkemailfilter.org - 40 - several IP where I log connect attempts > dummy1.junkemailfilter.com - 50 - several IP where I log connect attempts > Hmm, that's just a case of having backup servers. Works fine for ordinary SMTP, but isn't good enough for MUAs. When we set up our cluster, we set up the 4 machines on a round-robin DNS, so smtp.sussex.ac.uk points to four IP addresses. That seems to work well with MTAs, but doesn't work at all with MUAs. In order to provide high availability message submission, all four IP addresses have to be available at the same time. That's why we introduced IP failover. In theory, any one of the four machines could support all four SMTP IP addresses at the same time. We use spread/wackamole for failover, and it works really quite nicely, though not perfectly. I'd estimate that downtime is reduced by an order of magnitude. -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex x3148 -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
