On 7/18/07 1:01 PM, "Jeroen van Aart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nigel Metheringham wrote: >> On 18 Jul 2007, at 18:31, John Jetmore wrote: > >> Shame - it was a good package from all accounts. I was asked to produce > > With all the talk about spamfiltering I haven't seen any mention yet of > assp. I'm quite happy with it, once it has had time to learn it does a > thorough job, with very few false positives. > >> Obviously you can easily do outsourced spam scanning - Postini for >> example. My own experience of this (not with Postini) has not been >> positive so far, but then personally I would not have touched the >> company involved. > > Postini seems to do a good job, but leaves through more spam than > desired, which assp then has to catch. Proving assp actually works > better, here at least. Postini is in the process of being Google Gobbled. While Google doesn't seem to share Symantec's odd business model (pay a lot for things then destroy them), the transition is still a little worrysome. I don't know what Chris' message volume is, but the relatively new Cloudmark version which runs out of Spamassassin (possibly with all other rules removed) might be of interest. Not free. <http://cloudmark.com> --John -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
