On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:35:53 +0200, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 26 July 2007 19:20, Tom Ray [Lists] wrote: >> Well it is a domain I host. I did remove the MX records in a hope that >> it would stop the incoming traffic, but it hasn't. This domain is just a >> website pointer. It's not supposed to accept mail anyways. I didn't have >> it in the local_domains list. > > Ah, in that case you could add > > deny domains = mymsviews.com (add more domains if relevant) > message = $domain does not accept mail > > early in the ACL, to give an explicit message, even to local users. But > it's > not necessary; if you remove that superfluous "require verify = > recipient", > Exim will find that it doesn't know the domain locally and that the sender > > isn't authorized to relay (unless it is), and give an appropriate error > message. > >> And my dnslookup router is already this: >> >> dnslookup: >> driver = dnslookup >> domains = ! +local_domains >> transport = remote_smtp >> ignore_target_hosts = 0.0.0.0 : 127.0.0.0/8 >> no_more >> >> Is that just not doing the same thing? > > If you add > > self = fail > > then Exim will return a permanent error instead of a temporary one. > Normally > you don't want that, because "lowest numbered MX record points to > local host" is usually a configuration error, which you'd want to spot and > fix > before mail bounces. > > -- > Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks) > > "Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for > Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
-- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
