John Robinson wrote: > I know people disapprove of the use of port 465, but since it's the only > way of getting some MS Outlook versions to do SSL/TLS at all, I consider
What is wrong with port 465? Isn't it the default smtp over ssl port? grep 465 /etc/services ssmtp 465/tcp smtps # SMTP over SSL > it a necessary evil. Blame Microsoft. Of course blaming that company, even at random, is often a safe bet. ;-) Regards, Jeroen -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
