Hello, > Probably correct; however you may wish to consider the likelihood that a > message with no Date:, Subject: or To: field is legitimate, and tweak its > spam score accordingly if outright rejection is too risky in your > environment (in fact I think the default SpamAssassin ruleset does add > some points for these occurrences, but perhaps not significantly enough > when all three occur at once).
I will correct the return message to be more appropriate. Not having a date is just too risky with the myriad of M$ vulnerabilities out there. My experience with messages with no To line is an open dictionary attack where spammers are fishing the system for valid user names. For my system, I have no false positives with this setup. --- DynaStop: Stopping spam one dynamic IP address at a time. http://tanaya.net/DynaStop/ -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
