Martijn Grendelman wrote: > Hi, > >> There's a better way to do it without collateral spam described in a >> guide somewhere, but what you have is working for you so .. yeah. > > Well, I could just blackhole the message, of course.
The best implementation is to defer recipients in the ACL that don't have matching spam filter prefs to those already accepted. So for each unique spam preference profile, you'll have a distinct message, and can accept or reject at SMTP time uniformly. - Marc -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
