Wolfgang Breyha wrote:
> It seems that at least
> --- exim-4.69-cvssnap-2007-09-28.orig/src/expand.c 2007-09-19
> 09:29:17.000000000 +0200
> +++ exim-4.69-cvssnap-2007-09-28/src/expand.c 2007-10-04 14:07:04.000000000
> +0200
> @@ -409,6 +413,10 @@
> { "dk_status", vtype_dk_verify, NULL },
> { "dk_testing", vtype_dk_verify, NULL },
> #endif
> +#ifdef EXPERIMENTAL_DKIM
> + { "dkim_domain", vtype_stringptr, &dkim_signing_domain },
> + { "dkim_selector", vtype_stringptr, &dkim_signing_selector },
> +#endif
OK, that was embarrassing. Fixed. I also updated the snapshot. There are
no other changes. However I documented the dkim_sign_headers option for
the transport, which was missing:
http://wiki.exim.org/DKIM
> dkim_private_key = /etc/mail/domainkeys/${dkim_selector}.${dkim_domain}.pem
> in my smtp-router to sign mail. At least SpamAssassin is happy with the
> signatures;-)
Thanks for testing!
/tom
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
