--On 4 October 2007 08:48:05 -0400 Jeff Boehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since then, I have changed again and gone with the method listed below. > Now my queue lengths are usually under 200 messages which is much better. > Perhaps this is the best I can do, I suppose I should let it run for > awhile without intervening and see how it goes. I'm not sure that I've understood this exactly, but if it's true that you're no longer using queue only mode, and your queues are less than 200 messages, I'd suggest that you don't need split_spool_directory for performance reasons. split_spool_directory could be screwing you up, so try switching it off. You may wish to look at the code first, and see whether my theory is plausible. If it is, then the code needs fixing to randomise the directory order. -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex x3148 -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
