Renaud Allard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Do 08 Nov 2007 09:19:23 CET): > > > John W. Baxter wrote: > > > > > Long term, one files a change request (with or without suggested patch), and > > then we hope that somewhere in the available documentation is the reason > > Philip elected to use HELO, so that the coding isn't done only to find the > > reason the hard way. > > I guess Philip choose HELO, because in RFC2821 (par 2.2.1) it is noted that > servers and clients MUST accept the old HELO mechanisms as a fallback. > Furthermore many broken antispam/firewall solutions reject EHLO.
But if they accept HELO and later reject EHLO the callback (-forward) is worth about nothing. -- Heiko
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
