-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bryan Rawlins <bryan.rawl [EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Total: >122383 Spam >32594 Ham > >No TLS/SSL: >122383 Spam >27057 Ham > >TLS/SSL: >1064 Spam >5537 Ham > >My $0.02, It appears to be a useful as an indicator to influence an >overall score (eg. spammassassin), but as with many other things it >doesn't appear to be good for making an absolute decision based on just >this information. I suspect you are mainly measuring the performance of filters (or of mitigation of compromised hosts) at other ISP's sites. viz: the email doesn't originate at the machine that is using TLS, but one hop further back. >sslv3:aes256-sha:256 >23 Spam >39 Ham hence the variation between the ciphers, you're now picking out very small numbers of senders and measuring their performance at not sending you spam from their customers. - -- richard Richard Clayton They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 iQA/AwUBRzNa/ZoAxkTY1oPiEQKmdACaAwyT37kXJ1xV2wa+TMAv3H+rM/YAn0bM mLOBuoHv8iGxBzxGsyctDDnS =lv2r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
