On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 03:01:44PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > A word of warning, vacation messages are sent (by Exim, for example) to > > addresses found in headers, not the return-path. BATV will cause these to > > fail. > > I assume that vacation messages contain a sender. BATV just applies > for mails with an empty sender what is true for bounces only
I hope you assume wrong. Imagine the loop of competing vacation messages when they don't use a null sender ... -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | The state law of Pennsylvania prohibits | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | singing in the bathtub. | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
