On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 16:27 +0000, David Restall - System Administrator wrote: > Hi, > > I have one user (having problems) send me emails. He's using BATV and I'm > using sender callout. I bounce every one of his messages because exim > does the callout on the envelope address. He was able to send until > he started doing BATV. I've read the papers on BATV and from what I > can see, he should be keeping track of his outgoing envelopes and they > should come back as valid if I do a bounce. Can somebody confirm if my > interpretation is correct on this.
If both are implemented correctly, BATV and sender verification callouts should play well together. BATV signs the "MAIL FROM:" return envelope address. Callouts should use that address as the "RCPT TO:" with a null "MAIL FROM:<>". That null sender will trigger the BATV check, which should test correctly. If the callout is using the FROM: header received during the DATA phase with a null sender, that could cause the BATV test to fail. -- Chris -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
