On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 10:16:15PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > I'm having something of a hard time at the moment tracking down this > problem... but what I've found so far seems to indicate that Exim 4.62 > and 4.63 has some really odd behaviour.
Forget this; I realised that, of course, when 'bouncing' the message back to the local MTA, it qualified the unqualified address, resulting in a perfectly legal CC header. <grumble>. -- Russell King -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
