On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 09:50:01AM +0100, Leonardo Boselli wrote: > > Il 19 Dec 2007 alle 22:11 Daniel Collis-Puro immise in rete > > > Why not use a recipient verification callout for the destination mail > > > server? Something like: > > NOT feasible: > Sure it is. > > the secondary mx is usually used when the primary is of, or overloaded > > and do not accept more connections or give immediately a 421 error. > Look for 'smtp_reserve_hosts'. With this, you can allow the backup MX to > connect to the master even when the master is already 4xx'ing other > hosts because of things like smtp_load_reserve. > > Also for other reason caching, unless on a file that can be > > easily moved between the MX 13 and MX 20, is not usable. -- > Care to give a bit more info on that?
I expect that for some weeks will be some "erratic" maintenace periods when one or more of the server will be off or just unreacheable. so i cannot consider any solution that cannaot be carried across reboot or requires the availability of the main server. -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
