On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 20:30 +0000, Graeme Fowler wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 18:06 +0000, Peter Bowyer wrote: > > So this sounds like the Apache / mod_php bug referred to in the Debian > > bug that Marc H posted earlier in the thread.... > > Ah, it's all come back to me now. > > Don't run PHP via mod_php. If you want security, isolation and some > semblance of control, use suEXEC and run PHP as a CGI script, or better > (for PHP at the very least, and because of its' enhanced configurability > when compared to suEXEC) use suPHP instead. > > This is, of course, if you have the system resources to do so - mod_php > trades off the good things above against all but immediate code > compilation & execution through not having to fork()/exec() the > interpreter for every call. > > Still, none of this is Exim related. And neither, to be honest, is the > OP's problem - it's an Apache/mod_php problem. I do wonder, however, why > we don't see similar reports with PHP and sendmail/postfix/qmail et > al...
If it is a problem with inheriting file descriptors, it'd be easy to fix in Exim by closing all descriptors from 0 to NR_OPEN during program start. This could be what other mail programs are doing and why you do not see problems from them. -- Jonathan Briggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> eSoft, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
