am 10.01.2008 21:25 schrieb Scott McNaught: > Thank you for your reply. I have got it working following what you did. > > I have a few questions however. > > 1) With the router, won't it stop all further routers from being executed? > There are a few routers below this one, which being an exim novice, I don't > quite understand what they do.
remove the "no_more" in the router > 2) I would also like to know if there is much of a performance impact > re-calling the exim command via shell, and if this is the correct / most > optimized way to do this? Can't help with this. I don't "feel" any performance impact, so I did not see any need to make may setup more performant. > 3) In your perl script you depend on the header "envelope-from". Hmm, my script does not depend on envelope-from. The only place where I wrote about envelope from was in the reinjection: Here I explicitly *set* an envelope-from to my liking. > Is there a > guarantee that "envelope-from" is always set? From my experience, some mail > clients simply use the "from" header. Does exim always append the > "envelope-from" header for the stdin of the piped script? An envelope-from must allways be present, this is a requirement of the SMTP protocol. The envelope-from have to be a valid <email-address> or a empty one <>. Anything sending via SMTP and not including MAIL FROM:<..> is broken. Cheers, Peter -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
