Leonardo Boselli wrote: > Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2008 10:14:21 +0100 From: Serena Boykin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [koi8-r] > ��������, �������. ��������! > > Where in the universe today is 14 jan 2008, tuesday ??? >
'... apple.com' - who have always marched to the beat of a different drummer, and you need to even ask? ;-) > Why did accept such message ? > > -- Leonardo Boselli > > Why would it not? Absent one or more of: - a filter or SA rule w/r 'date in future' or some such, (neither is in default setup, and we don't know your config) - an acl checking headers for format/RFC-compliance to a degree of detail I don't think Exim makes w/r dates [1], (also not in the default). Bill [1] Based on passing traffic from other MTA or MUA with 'real, but woefully not-now dates (Jan 1 1970) - I don't *think* that date/time are actually checked for 'sanity' even so. AFAIK, the check when used at all is only for presence/absence of a date, in the correct place and in 'a' correct format. But I have not looked at that code. And I am wrong as often as the myriad of humankind's many, many calendars... Check France last decade of the 1700's and what crawled in along with the metric system. -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
