W B Hacker wrote:
> Another port, yes. But that still does not justify ignoring IETF/IANA
> w/r *465*. Especially since they reserve port 24 for 'any private email
What is easier to ignore, IETF/IANA, or a complaining user base who
suddenly find their email (their internet) is broken? I assume 465 at
some point was "offically" for encrypted smtp, then it changed. But I am
sure anyone knows how hard it is to get rid of ingrown habits.
As a side note, I see port 0 recently got assigned, which feels a bit
unfair, it should be reserved (for the sake of it :-)
spr-itunes 0/tcp Shirt Pocket netTunes
spl-itunes 0/tcp Shirt Pocket launchTunes
David Nanian <dnanian&shirt-pocket.com> 28 September 2007
Regards,
Jeroen
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
