Tony Finch wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Renaud Allard wrote:
>> The mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be accepted for delivery, although 
>> it
>> should not as it is unqualified. Obviously, the mail is rejected at yahoo.
> 
> "Unqualified" in Exim terminology refers to addresses (not domains) and it
> means an address with no @domain part. It does not apply to domains that
> are not fully qualified.

Indeed, I used a bad terminology here.

> 
>> After running exim -bhc 193.190.18.193 with the same data as formerly, I saw
>>>>> re-routed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> I think this implies you have a widen_domains option and rewrite_headers
> set to false.
>

Well, widen_domains and rewrite_headers are both unset, so I guess they
are at their default values (widen_domains unset and
rewrite_headers=true). And there is nothing in the rewriting rules.

So this should not produce the "re-routed" effect AFAIK. I really don't
see any place where it could even find the wallonie.be suffix, except
maybe in "qualify_domain" and in local_domains.

Do you have something else for me to test to find out why such
re-routing occurs?




Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

-- 
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to