On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Robert Bannocks wrote:
>
> So perhaps the manual should be revised to give the plain text
> authenticator to have a server_condition like:
Thanks for the suggestion. I have committed a change which will be in the
4.70 spec. I wonder if a better alternative would be for ldpaauth{} to
check if the DN syntax is correct... dunno.
Tony.
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/