Nigel Metheringham wrote:
On 21 Feb 2008, at 16:14, Yves Goergen wrote:On 21.02.2008 14:16 CE(S)T, Nigel Metheringham wrote:[ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]Oops, you're listed yourself at rfc-ignorant. I guess you don't take that service for real, too, hm? ;)Hmm... thats sort of embarrassing. In mitigation:- - the evidence related to that shows its symantec (outsourced spam/malware scanning service) that bounced it. I knew there was a reason we dumped them (other than their spam scanning being crap). - this is no longer the case at present - I don't actually use that domain myself.... - I'll fix the rfc-ignorant entries shortly
AFAIK, people at rfc-ignorant generally "manually" verify the entries before validating them. So if you do accept postmaster, that's quite strange.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
