Phil Pennock wrote: > On 2008-02-29 at 23:31 -0500, Al Rozell wrote: > >> Thanks very much Phil , I am half way home... I added the >> +SMTP_configuration and did get confirmation from godaddy. Your >> return_path idea did get the mail sent. >> Unfortunately, return_path is not being set to what i am setting :) (but >> the mail is going out)... It is showing up as Sender: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > Where is that showing up? In a tcpdump (authoritative)? Or in the Exim > loglines which have '<=' on them, showing the sender _as_received_? > > You want to use +return_path_on_delivery in log_selector to see the > return_path as sent; *not* sender_on_delivery. > > * return_path_on_delivery: The return path that is being transmitted with > the > message is included in delivery and bounce lines, using the tag P=. This > is > omitted if no delivery actually happens, for example, if routing fails, or > if delivery is to /dev/null or to ":blackhole:". > > * sender_on_delivery: The message's sender address is added to every > delivery > and bounce line, tagged by F= (for "from"). This is the original sender > that was received with the message; it is not necessarily the same as the > outgoing return path. > > -Phil > > > The "Sender" is showing up in the message when it arrives. I believe your return_path solved why the message was being rejected initially.
Now, I need to figure out how to configure EXIM to substitute the correct "sender" (eg., [EMAIL PROTECTED]) instead of using [EMAIL PROTECTED] as the sender in the message. -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
