W B Hacker wrote: > Presuming you have any influence at all over their configuration, why > would you want to position yourself as part of the PROBLEM - by > suggesting that those who make effective use of rDNS fail/mismatch cease > so doing?
I thought the point was that hosts _WITH_ rDNS where being rejected, because they were "generic". That in my book _IS_ wrong. No reverse is potentially lazy administration (or due to policy of the clients on that network). It's not a "be all, end all" indicator of spam, people filtering on that alone should be slapped about with wet kippers. Regards D. -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
