Florian Weimer wrote: > * Renaud Allard: > >>> Is there some sort of configuration hack that could help to address >>> this problem? I don't want to fall back to SSL 3.0 globally (hich >>> would solve this particular problem), and sender-specific >>> configuration is only a last resort. >> sslv2 is deprecated (in 2006, all major browsers dropped support for >> it). Most applications still understand them, but it is not recommended >> for use anymore. So sticking with ssl3 still looks like the best and >> easiest approach. > > Yes, but I'd still prefer to use TLS 1.0. 8-/ >
Something like this should solve your issue, while still permitting TLS1 tls_require_ciphers = AES : 3DES : !SSLv2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
