On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 09:36 -0400, Marc Sherman wrote: > > (Also, rejecting for SPF fail is particularly 'brave'. I'd recommend > > googling for 'sender address forgery' and reading the first link that > > Google shows up.) > > I'm on your side here, but don't you think demonstrating your own google > rank is a bit disingenuous? :)
I didn't think so, no. Is it misleading in any way? Perhaps if it was intended to hide the fact that I wrote the page in question, I suppose... but given the hostname in the URL (and the examples, and the address at the bottom, etc.), I think that would be a little hard to achieve. And even then, why would it matter who wrote it? Maybe it could be construed as being a little egotistical, but is it really any worse than using the host name 'david.woodhou.se'? :) Besides, at least if I cite the google search, they can get to the snake oil site too -- that's hits 2 and 3 iirc. -- dwmw2 -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
