Hello Tony, Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Do 08 Mai 2008 13:49:10 CEST): > On Thu, 8 May 2008, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > > > > Does exist some standard (RFC) saying that it's fatal mistake to have no > > A record for the first MX? > > The relevant spec is section 5 of RFC 2821. It isn't very good :-( > The draft revision of the spec is better: see > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-10.txt > > I think since only one out of three MX records for your domain are broken, > it is not reasonable to reject the message entirely. RFC 2821 says "If MX > records are present, but none of them are usable, this situation MUST be > reported as an error." (note the "none")
Thank you.
Best regards from Dresden
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE -----------------------------------------
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome - key ID: 48D0359B ---------------
gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B -
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
