--On 4 June 2008 13:55:58 +0100 Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Jethro R Binks wrote: >> >> It is a while since I looked at what Exim did, but as I recall there were >> two main ways of generating an auto-reply. One was using the "vacation" >> command in a filter, whch by default uses $reply_address (== "From:", or >> "Reply-To"). The other is the autoreply transport, which takes a "to" >> option which has no default, so leaves it up to the user to make the >> choice of address to use. > > They both use the same code. > > I'm thinking of fixing Exim to be conformant to RFC 3834 by default. Configurability would be nice. > Tony. > -- > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\ > N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\ > \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}} -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex x3148 -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
