That's it!
I can't imagine why I haven't seen this spam=... option. This makes it
much more easy. So now, drinking a fresh hot coffee with milk and sugar,
this should be done in a few minutes!
Thanks for your advice!
Alex
Phil Pennock schrieb:
> On 2008-09-01 at 13:49 -0700, Phil Pennock wrote:
>
>> The entry in the ACL used for acl_smtp_rcpt which includes "verify =
>> recipient" will not use the Routers marked no_verify for determining
>> whether or not an address exists. However, if you do this then you'll
>> accept spam and generate a bounce, producing backscatter.
>>
>
> Meh, I drank more coffee. You're already producing backscatter.
>
> I'm happy that you've now improved your situation, but please do look at
> moving the checking into ACL-time checks to avoid this. You should be
> able to use per-user spam-scanning with an ACL just fine. When you use
> the spam condition, you write
>
> spam = ${something that expands to the user that SpamAssassin should use}
>
> Please read over "41. CONTENT SCANNING AT ACL TIME" in The Exim
> Specification.
>
> -Phil
>
>
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
