Odhiambo Washington wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Martin A. Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Marc Perkel wrote: >> >>> Definitely looking for feedback and improvements on this. >>> >>> >> Any allegedly production quality Perl code needs to start with "use >> strict; use warnings;". This scripts fails to pass "perl -cw" when those >> are added. Happy to revisit when it does so. >> >> > > You are very right Martin. However, this script has been around for > ages and despite the fact that it fails the perl -cw, it's worked to > serve the purpose for which it was meant. It could be inefficient but > has been very accurate. I can attest to this. > As applies to almost all free code, you use at your own risk. > >
The part of the code that creates those errors is not the part I modified. That's the original code. I'm not much of a perl guy but if someone sent me a patch that fixes it I'd appreciate it. Otherwise I'll eventually get around to it. -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
