Robert Nicholson wrote:
> These regex's get a bit unwieldy ... can this be data driven thru a
> file or can this regex be written/formatted so that it's more readable?
>
> if foranyaddress $header_to:,$header_cc: ( $thisaddress matches ^robert
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> a.com\$ ) and ( $header_content-type: does not match "\\s*=\\?
> (ks_c_5601-|big5|e
> uc-|shift-jis|(iso.\{0,4\}639-)|hkscs|sil|koi[78]|iscii|guobiao|gb2312|
> gb18030|(
> iso.\{0,4\}2022)|(iso.\{0,4\}8859-[57])|(windows-1251)|
> (windows-1255))" or $head
> er_subject: does not match "\\s*=\\?(ks_c_5601-|big5|euc-|shift-jis|
> (iso.\{0,4\}
> 639-)|hkscs|sil|koi[78]|iscii|guobiao|gb2312|gb18030|(iso.\{0,4\}2022)|
> (iso.\{0,
> 4\}8859-[57])|(windows-1255))" )
>
*Until* it is written to be more readable, the rather smallish number
here who have the expertise to grok it may not bother...
What - in Peter-Rabbit English - is it intended to *accomplish*?
A donut vs coin-of-whatever-realm still has value sez there are several
ways to do {whatever} - though not necessarily in one step.
Standing by ...
Bill Hacker
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
