Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:41:45 +0300, "Mike Barnard"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Exim List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> We have a machine with several domains.  The MX record for these domains
>>> is pointed to a spam filter appliance.
>>>
>>> Alas, spammers don't play fair.  They choose to connect directly to the
>>> IP address(es) of the domains on the box and still send their spam that
>>> way.
>> you lost me there.... if the the MX records are the spam filter
>> appliances... how did they get the IP addresses of the actual smtp
>> servers...
> 
> Most probably, the spam filter appliances are new and the MX records
> used to point to the actual SMTP servers. Some Spamware comes with a
> list of IP addresses to deliver to and doesn't care about MX records
> to speed up delivery, so their data base might be outdated, which is
> an advantage for the Spammer in the OP's case.

My experience is that some spammers look for mail.* and simply try to 
connect directly to that.

When you are dealing with a brand new startup, you can plan around that.

When you are dealing with legacy domains and legacy customer bases, 
especially in acquisitions, you can't force a bunch of changes, at least 
all at once.


-- 
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to