[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06.10.2008 19:12:04: ...
> Unless / until you turn up your logging detail or add some tracking > tools (see also 'debug_print') you can only be sure what took place with > those routers that do what was expected of them and leave footprints in > the logs. Or somewhere else recoverable/visible. > > So the 'NOT offered' may or may not be correct, and may or may not be > for the reason you believe it to be such. > > Bill Well I've looked at the source code. Looks like Exim does the following. Assume a message has 2 recipients at the same domain. First of them *is handled* by some router that has a "same_domain_copy_routing" option set. Exim "marks" processed address and then checks if there are more recipients at this domain. If they are then they will be routed with *the same* router as the first recipient. In this case Exim *never* returns to routers list (maybe "unseen" option could help - I don't check). Well it is not a bug - but someone *should be careful* with this option if he tries to use a router with per-recipient condition... Andrew, Bill - thanks again for help. Vitas. -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
