On 10/14/08 16:26, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> Jason Keltz wrote:
>> The problem with this approach, I believe, is that the sender gets back 
>> "texthere", and the delivery is deferred.  I would prefer for the 
>> message to be accepted by the system, but queued for delivery until the 
>> name is removed from the "temporary stop delivery" file.
> 
> That's what it does. Except it will inform the sending party. I assume 
> you want to avoid actual notification of the email being deferred? I 
> don't know the specifics by heart, but I am sure the configuration entry 
> dealing with deferring email can be changed to not notify the sender. 
> But that I believe would break smtp standards, so you'd rather create a 
> custom entry.

Hi Jeroen,

When I added the line to my aliases file, and tried to send a message to 
the account with Thunderbird, the message that I added to my aliases 
file was displayed in Thunderbird, but the message was not queued for 
delivery on the mail server.  I'd be fine if the sending user got a 
message that their message was queued for delivery.  Is this the correct 
behaviour? or am I misunderstanding?

Jason.


-- 
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to