Brian Blood wrote: > On Oct 27, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Brian Blood wrote: > >> On Oct 27, 2008, at 3:23 PM, W B Hacker wrote: >> >>>> acl_ variables aren't defined in the message generated by the >>>> autoreply transport driver >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Nor can they be. >>> >>> The router/transport chain has ONLY read-access to acl_m variables. >> >> I didn't say they weren't readable/writable, I'm saying they don't >> exist for the message generated by the autoreply transport driver. > > > Good reason for this... > > I don't have ANY acls setup for not_smtp type connections.... >
That's was sort of where I was trying to steer you .. setting up beforehand in an acl. Though I hadn't twigged to it being non-smtp...primarily 'coz I go to extreme lengths to not allow non_smtp anyway.... > That'll teach me to think! > > Brian > > LOL! Running an MTA requires a willingness to accumulate scar-tissue on one's nether parts. ;-) Bill -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
