On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:26:53PM -0500, Troy Settle wrote:
> I recently dropped service with Postini, in favor of attacking spam on 
> my own.  Over the last month, we've implemented the following:
> 
>     * Fake MX
>     * Per-user Allow/Deny lists (bypasses DNSBL, Greylist, & SA)
>     * DNSBL (based on >20 messages with a SA score >12)
>     * 15 minute greylisting (based on the exim wiki article)
>     * Limit hosts to 1 rcpt per connection
>     * Clam-av with 3rd party signatures
>     * SpamAssassin with SARE rules (reject >12, quarntine >2)
> 
> Here are some numbers from yesterday:
> 
>     * No stats on fake MX yet (I just did this today)
>     * 220k rcpts deferred via greylisting
>     * 8k rcpts rejected by local DNSBL
>     * 1.2k messages rejected by clamav
>     * 6k messages rejected with SA score > 12
>     * 18k messages delivered to spam quarantine
>     * 14k messages delivered to inbox
> 
> The delivery stats are slightly better than we had with Postini, but I 
> think they can be better.  What other tips & tricks are out there for 
> public consumption?

Unrouteable address                     2020
Fake Yahoo                              37967
Fake hotmail                            84105
Fake MSN                                8
Fake AOL                                872
host is listed in zen.spamhaus.org      32268
Blacklisted URL in message              1397
Sender verify fail                      298
Spamassassin reject                     545
Spamassassin warn                       20521


deny message = Faked hotmail, so you must be spam.
           log_message = Fake hotmail
           senders = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
           condition = ${if match {$sender_host_name} \
                        {\Nhotmail.com$\N}{no}{yes}}

Think I got the above from the exim wiki, its been very effective for
me.

-- 
Pete


-- 
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to