Ian Eiloart wrote:
> --On 7 December 2008 18:05:35 +1100 Ted Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
>
>   
>> Marc Perkel wrote:
>>     
>>> It's hardly a solution in that it doesn't do what I want. I want to be
>>> able to look at the reason for the 550 rejection. So if it's "unknown
>>> user" it gets treated differently from "relaying denied". If I had that
>>> I could make a choice to refusing an email or accepting it and storing
>>> it.
>>>       
>> There are no ACLs or any kind of configuration options available for
>> outgoing SMTP connections that would give you the control needed. No one
>> is going to code it for you.
>>     
>
> But, actually, that's not an unreasonable request. We're talking about call 
> forwards. Exim MUST have access to the reply after a call forward, which IS 
> being used in an ACL. I don't know the code, but I'd imagine it would be 
> reasonable to ask that more information about the call forward is made 
> available.
>
> I'd like to be able to get the SMTP greeting from a callout, so that I can 
> log statistics about server types, for example. And, so that I can better 
> advise third parties with misconfigured servers.
>
>   

Yeah - if I could just get the server response in a string I could do 
conditionals based on that information.

-- 
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to