On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 09:38 +0000, Peter Bowyer wrote: > ... with the caveat that all outgoing mail must be signed, implying > that it (probably) all needs to flow out through the same MTA.
Additionally, I've started seeing (because I'm monitoring the account which catches rubbish at work) autoreply messages being rejected by PRVS/BATV enabled systems. Presumably this is because a lot of autoreply generators use a null envelope sender, so are processed as bounces in order to prevent mail loops. Since not all null envelopes are bounces (although the majority are) this is a slight flaw in the design of BATV. Ho hum. Graeme PS yes, I understand that there are pseudo-religious views on autoresponses... -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
