--On 6 February 2009 14:50:19 +0000 Jethro R Binks <[email protected]> wrote:
> > (Although, the same argument is useable here as against greylisting and > other techniques: once a critical mass of receiving servers implement > these techniques, it will be worth the while of spammers to accomodate > them, play by the rules, design better SMTP engines, in order to get > their mail past the techniques. But I think we're a long way to go yet, > and there's probably a huge legacy of crap spammy SMTP clients out there > that are easily defeatable.). Yes, but this isn't just about spam. It's also about not accepting emails with malformed address headers. Those addresses aren't just there to look pretty, they're used by MUAs and even MTAs to address replies. If the From:, To: or Cc: header is malformed, then the replies may also be malformed, or misdirected. -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex x3148 -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
