On Tue Feb 24, 2009 at 12:42:56 +0000, Jethro R Binks wrote: > > On the other hand I've had good success rejecting messages with > > no Date header - as that MUST be present... > > I've often wondered whether to bother with that. SA assigns a couple of > points for it, but there is certainly more justification for rejecting > outright on that basis. Nearly 500 hits on SA's MISSING_DATE rule today
I reject outright mails with no Date header, just over 1200 messages today. It's a low-tech test that is easy to perform and has had zero false-positives or complaints to date. Steve -- Managed Anti-Spam Service http://mail-scanning.com/ -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
