Phil Pennock wrote: > On 2009-03-10 at 12:02 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote: > >> Then I ran that through a recursive ACL to get each one separately so I >> can look each one up individually. Then the idea is to run eack one >> through another ACL that does a lot of lookups, first testing white >> lists and then black lists. >> > > Exim is not primarily a programming language and doesn't have > tail-recursion optimisation for processing ACLs; each call to ACL > expansion puts a layer on the stack. To protect against this, you can > only have ACLs call ACLs to a maximum depth of 20. > > This isn't really a limitation normally, because without this > safety-check you risk exceeding your process stack rlimits based on the > content of external mail, which would be a rather bad idea. This is > highly unlikely to change. > > So your recursive ACL will fail with an Exim hard error which will > probably hit your panic log when there's somewhere near 20 URLs in the > body. > > You probably want to look at restructuring to use the forall/forany > expansion conditions instead. > > -Phil > >
I'm having trouble understanding the forall/forany. Can I put an ACL in for the condition? Do you have an example? -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
