normallybaffled wrote: > *trimmed*
>> .... There is nothing we can see that should trigger a block at >> barracuda other than the user's offending ip address... have you heard of >> this happening to anyone else? >> Yes on the Caca-ruda. There have even been a few posts *here* of those writing-up Exim acl tests that 'dug into' prior received info when that is clearly and obviously going to eventually hit a dynamic / DHCP'ed IP and/or non-routable IP (192. or localhost, 127. etc) at the MUA and first leg of sending in nearly all cases. Not a useful test for anything coming off an end-user MUA, though it can cut traffic load astonishngly well... ;-) Bill -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
