Graeme Fowler escribió: > On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 10:21 +0100, Mike Cardwell wrote: > >> Have you considered replacing swear words with ****'s instead of >> rejecting messages that contain them? >> > > Beware, beware, beware the "Scunthorpe problem" [0] > > Profanity filtering is a terribly complicated thing to get right, and > generic word filtering is even worse when you consider English county > names, the fact that you can buy chicken breasts, and that to "parse" > this message you find a "bad word" in the very act! > Besides that, doing that kind of filtering may be illegal in some countries (in Spain, i.e.)
Regards > Anyone with active sweary filters probably won't get this :) > > Graeme > > [0] if you fancy a chuckle, look up the Wikipedia entry for it... > > > -- Eduardo Diaz Comellas - [email protected] Ultreia Comunicaciones S.L. -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
