On 2009-06-10 at 23:44 -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 02:55:54PM -0700, Phil Pennock wrote: > > > Right, I wasn't sure if it would send mail to all of them or not. I had > > > only tested, so far, the case where this host is the only MX for > > > $domain. But there doesn't seem to be a way to get only the low-number > > > MX for a given domain...? > > > > http://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20090527.213428.45e1069c.en.html > > Wow, that's... impressive! And maybe just a little terrifying. :)
Thank you, I'm here all week. > What do you think of this revised set of routes: Tentatively, looks sane. Provided that $self_hostname is the rewritten hostname, not the original one, and I don't feel like testing that for myself right now. If you haven't already seen it, "exim -d" and various augmentations thereof (exim -d+expand+dns+route) can be informative, especially if you can set up a parallel set of test domains in DNS to trial the changes on your test box. -Phil -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
