Rick Cooper wrote: > ----Original Message---- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Renaud Allard Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 1:32 PM > To: Peter Bowyer > Cc: exim users; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [exim] DKIM and DomainKeys > >> On 6/29/09 4:54 PM, Peter Bowyer wrote: >>> On 29/06/2009, Rick Cooper<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Is there any work being done, or a patch available, to allow signing >>>> both DKIM and DomainKeys without sending a message through exim twice? >>> Last heard, Tom's DKIM patch is mutually exclusive with the Domainkeys >>> functionality. I've asked about re-considering this for what I thought >>> were obvious reasons.... he's busy with real work at the moment but >>> will re-surface sometime soon I expect. >>> >> I am sucessfully signing all messages with both Domainkeys and DKIM >> using an exim snapshot (post 4.69). > > Sorry, Didn't hit reply all, the first time > > > I downloaded the latest snapshot, and I see no documentation as to the > changes for the DKIM and DK support. I do see that EDITME no longer has > either EXPERIMENTAL_ definitions and I see DKIM is compiled in unless > un-defined. But it appears the EXPERIMENTAL_DOMAINKEYS section still needs > to be in the Makefile? And what about the items such as dk_selector, > $dk_domain and so forth? Are these now $dkim_domain and dkim_selector? That > is how the code appears to be written, but I don't see anything relating to > domainkeys... Does it just sign both ways? > > Any help you could give would be much appreciated
I believe the though line (which is listed in bug 376) goes along the lines of - DomainKeys is depricated, DKIM is its replacement, let's move swiftly towards that goal. -- The Exim Manual http://www.exim.org/docs.html http://docs.exim.org/current/ -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
