On 16/07/2009, Alain Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 03:54:45PM +0100, Martin A. Brooks wrote: > > On 16/07/2009 15:27, Alain Williams wrote: > > >I am interested. The latest exim (4.66) is 2 years old, if it gets much > > >older > > >it will start to rot. > > > > > > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding but .... > > > > http://www.exim.org/version.html > > OK - I need some new specs, however 4.69 is 20 Dec 2009[**] - 1.5 years old, > almost as bad.
ITYM 2007. Yes, old. But don't conflate old with bad. Whilst a release is certainly overdue, it's a testament to the stability and maturity of the Exim codebase that we don't need to see regular bugfix releases. Peter -- Peter Bowyer Email: [email protected] Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/peeebeee -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
