Hi! Physicman wrote, on 22.01.2008 15:31: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:05:33 +0100 > Wolfgang Breyha <[email protected]> wrote: >> Fine! I'll try to get the patch and documentation reworked again on weekend >> and send it to Tom Kistner for CVS inclusion. The main reason why I released >> the patch mostly "as is" was that I wanted to wait for feedback first. >> > That would be great. Let me know if I can help in some way. :)
Well, it took me a "little longer" then a weekend, but I rewrote my DCC patch and put it on again here: http://www.blafasel.at/exim-dccacl/ I had to change and rework the return codes, too. So everybody using my patch and using defer dcc = * to greylist MUST change that to defer !dcc = * now, to get the same results. I also added a new "feature" (or hack). If $acl_m_dcc_add_header is filled with some headers before dcc is called, these headers are added "in deep" as well. I for myself use that to pass the ClamAV result to SpamAssassin to check for the great sanesecurity patterns there. Maybe there's a better solution for adding headers in the middle of DATA which are passed to later ACL stages like SpamAssassin, but this one works pretty nice;-) Working on a RAM disc (exim scan folder) is highly recommended. Since Tom added my older patch to the CVS maybe one of the devs can add this one, too? Regards, Wolfgang Breyha -- Wolfgang Breyha <[email protected]> | http://www.blafasel.at/ Vienna University Computer Center | Austria -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
