Dave Evans wrote: > http://wiki.exim.org/FAQ/General_Debugging/Q0002 > > "exim -d+all -bh X.X.X.X". Or use -bhc instead of -bh. > > Regards, > > Thank you for the reply. I am now entirely annoyed at Exchange! It seems that the warn I have in place is actually already rejecting the majority of mail for our customers domains instead of adding the second header. So that means that the ACL I thought wasn't working is actually working perfectly. Typically however, the server that I was using to test the ACL is not. It appears to be accepting all mail and then generating a bounce instead of rejecting non-valid recipients at the SMTP time. But that is a completely separate issue that I will look later. Thanks folks.
-- Regards, Colin Waring, +44 (0)1704 564047 Southport Computers Local IT Support http://www.southportcomputers.co.uk Southport Web Web Design and Hosting Services http://www.southportweb.co.uk -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
