On 18/02/2010 23:56, Marten Lehmann wrote:

> While this works fine:
>
> and {
>       { eq{}{} }
>       { eq{}{} }
> }
>
> but does not allow for nested conditions since there is no "else". So I
> need an if-condition so I can extend the "that" later.

The alternative way of using eq allows that...

"eq{foo}{bar}{then}{else}"

"eq{foo}{bar}" on it's own is equivalent to:

"eq{foo}{bar}{true}{false}"

So you can do stuff like this:

and {\
    {\
       eq{foo}{bar}\
          {eq{x}{y}}\
          {eq{a}{b}}\
    }\
    {\
       eq{1}{2}\
    }\
}


-- 
Mike Cardwell    : UK based IT Consultant, Perl developer, Linux admin
Cardwell IT Ltd. : UK Company - http://cardwellit.com/       #06920226
Technical Blog   : Tech Blog  - https://secure.grepular.com/
Spamalyser       : Spam Tool  - http://spamalyser.com/

-- 
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users 
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

Reply via email to