> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:35:00 -0700
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [exim] smtp_max
>
> Jean-Paul natola wrote:
> > smtp_accept_max_per_host
> >
> > smtp_accept_max
> >
> > im currently configured like this:
> >
> > smtp_accept_max = 20
> > smtp_accept_max_per_host = 4
> > smtp_accept_reserve = 0
>
> Looks like those settings are fair. But it's not really going to solve
> your problem. You need to implement some proper spam blocking methods.
>
> There's various ways to do that. Without getting too specific to the
> software used:
>
> Use spamhaus' DROP list to block ranges for ALL traffic at the firewall
> level. Add IPs to taste, you never want to see traffic from, think
> country blocking if that's your cup of tea.
>
> Use your own block list to block connections to port 25. As well as
> various DNSBLs.
>
> Use grey listing.
>
> Use invalid HELO blocking.
>
> Use invalid or no rDNS blocking.
>
> That should slow down the hammering considerably. I'd be glad to help
> you out more if you need specific information.
>
> Regards,
> Jeroen
>
> --
> ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
> That should slow down the hammering considerably. I'd be glad to help
> you out more if you need specific information.
>
I would appreciate that
i do use SA but that scans messages AFTER they made it through exim, my only
fear of gateway blocking is that we are a NGO and work with people in ALMOST
every country
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your
inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
