On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 15:24 +0100, Ian Eiloart wrote: > --On 14 May 2010 14:57:59 +0100 Ron White <[email protected]> wrote: > > > A couple of child like questions for my own sanity here; > > > > 1. Am I right in thinking you can have multiple condition = statements > > in a router? (I know you can do 'and' but I have three conditions to > > check in a router) > > I think so. I'm not sure, but I don't see any reason why not. > > > 2. The redirect router - does it physically rewrite the 'to' rather than > > just redirect the message to a different user eg: > > > > data = ${quote_local_part:$acl_m_domcatc...@$domain > > no_more > > > > assuming conditions test true, would rewrite the 'to' to the contents of > > the expanded $acl_m_domcatchd @ $domain? > > No, the headers aren't rewritten because message headers aren't used in > message routing. Think of Bcc recipients. > > There are ways to rewrite the headers, though. > > > 3. If so, would the message then traverse the RCPT ACL's again with the > > new 'RCPT TO'? > > I don't think that ACLs are reconsidered. You can always route the message > back through exim, I guess. You'll have to be careful to not create a loop. > > > 4. Can I change the value of an $acl_m_variable in a router? > > My guess is no. > > > 5. If I test routing with: exim -bt [email protected] this is not going > > to fire the ACL tests for the address? I ask because I have some > > conditions in a few routers that test against acl variables which don't > > seem to get set with this. I fully accept that it's just testing the > > routers section (not running ACL logic) but I just need to be sure and > > clear in my head this is the case. > > I think you're right. Certainly you won't test any ACLs that depend on the > sender address or the message content - because you don't have any. Even if > the RCPT TO ACLs are tested, locally submitted messages might be exempt. > > You can test these ACLs with telnet. > > > You know how some days you question your sanity? Well I get it every > > Friday. > > > > Ron > > > > -- > Ian Eiloart > IT Services, University of Sussex > 01273-873148 x3148 > For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ > > > Thank you Ian . Appreciated as always.
-- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
